Mr. Muller is a Leading Florida Attorney. To be selected, attorneys must receive multiple recommendations from their peers in a statewide survey conducted by American Research Corporation. Fewer than 6% of the state's attorneys are Leading Florida Attorneys. Mr. Muller was selected as a Leading Florida Attorney in the area of Felony & Misdemeanor Criminal Defense.
In addition, a total of 846 lawyers or 1.6% of the lawyers practicing in Florida were selected for Florida Trend's Legal Elite, by a poll of practicing attorneys in Florida. Chandler Muller was named to the list, in Criminal Law for 2005.
Mr. Muller is listed in the Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers, for those who have achieved the prestigious "AV" rating in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory. The "A" signifies the highest levels of legal ability, while the "V" denotes "very high" adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and diligence.
Mr. Muller has been admitted to practice before The Florida Supreme Court, The U.S. District Court of Appeals in the Northern and Middle Districts of Florida, The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Published Opinions
Federal
United States Supreme Court
Roe v. Doe, 493 U.S. 964 (1989)
U.S. Court of Appeals
Hill v. Butterworth, 941 F.Supp.1129 (N.D.Fla., 1996)
U.S. v. Davis, 666 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. (Ga.), 1982)
U.S. v. Insco, 365 F. Supp. 1308 (M.D.Fla., 1973)
State
Florida Supreme Court
White v. State, 817 So.2d 799 (Fla., 2002)
State v. Williams, 797 So.2d 1235 (Fla., 2001)
Maharaj v. State, 778 So.2d 9441 (Fla., 2000)
In re Wood, 720 So.2d 506 (Fla., 1998)
Orange County v. Williams, 702 So.2d 1245 (Fla., 1997)
Kaplan v. State, 697 So.2d 144 (Fla., 1997)
Matter of Adoption Doe, 543 So.2d 741 (Fla., 1989)
Hansbrough v. State, 509 So.2d 1081 (Fla., 1987)
Williams v. Wainright, 503 So.2d 890 (Fla., 1987)
The Florida Bar v. Sheldon, 446 So.2d 1081 (Fla., 1984)
In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Gridley, 417 So.2d 950 (Fla., 1982)
The Florida Bar v. Ullensvang, 400 So.2d 969 (Fla., 1981)
District Courts of Appeal
O'Neal v. Sun Bank, N.A., 754 So.2d 170 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 2000)
Orange County v. Davis, 414 So.2d 2778 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 2000)
Oakes v. State, 746 So.2d 510 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1999)
Kaplan v. State, 681 So.2d 1166 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1996)
Brown v. State, 639 So.2d 634, (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1994)
Richardson v. State, 617 So.2d 801 (Fla.App. 2 Dist., 1993)
Ferguson v. State, 596 So.2d 1293 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1992)
Richards v. Richards, 599 So.2d 135 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1992)
C.R. v. E --, 573 So.2d 1088 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1991)
Peterson v. State, 573 So.2d 199 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1991)
Matter of Adoption of Doe, 524 So.2d 1037 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1988)
Laberge v. State, 508 So.2d 416 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1987)
McAvoy v. State, 501 So.2d 642 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1986)
Dodd v. State, 471 So.2d 668 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1985)
Roberts v. State, 467 So.2d 439 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1985)
Schmitt v. State, 458 So.2d 1183 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1984)
Webb v. State, 426 So.2d 1033 (Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1983)
Talton v. State 362 So.2d 686 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1978)
Reese v. Seaboard Coastline R. Co., 360 So.2d 27 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1977)
Crane v. Simpson, 352 So.2d 1248 (Fla.App. 1 Dist., 1977)
Fessler v. State, 326 So.2d 197 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1976)
Jones v. Smith, 278 So.2d 339 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1973)
Love v. State, 270 So.2d 408 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1972)
Williams v. Groover, 244 So.2d 474 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1970)
Williams v. State, 239 So.2d 127 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1970)
Brown v. State, 232 So.2d 55 (Fla.App. 4 Dist., 1970)
